Module 3: Self-Evaluation - Peer Review Processes

Self-Evaluation Instructions

Complete this self-evaluation honestly to assess your understanding of peer review processes and your readiness to implement these concepts. Your responses will help identify areas for further development and guide your ongoing learning.

Conceptual Understanding

Rate your understanding of the following concepts on a scale of 1-5: 1 = Limited understanding 2 = Basic understanding 3 = Moderate understanding 4 = Strong understanding 5 = Comprehensive understanding

Concept	Rating (1-5)	Notes on Understanding
Structured review methodologies
Effective feedback principles
Psychological safety in peer reviews
Collaborative improvement approaches
Review documentation best practices

Reflection Questions:

1. What is the relationship between structured review methodologies and review effectiveness?

2. How do effective feedback principles contribute to professional development?

3. Why is psychological safety essential for successful peer review processes?

4. How do collaborative improvement approaches differ from traditional feedback models?

5. What role does documentation play in the peer review process?

Application Readiness

Rate your confidence in applying the following skills on a scale of 1-5: 1 = Not confident 2 = Somewhat confident 3 = Moderately confident 4 = Confident 5 = Very confident

Skill	Rating (1-5)	Development Needs
Conducting structured peer reviews
Delivering constructive feedback
Receiving feedback non-defensively
Facilitating collaborative improvement
Documenting review outcomes

Application Scenarios:

For each scenario, describe how you would apply peer review concepts:

1. Scenario: You need to review a colleague’s conversation that shows strong technical knowledge but lacks engagement and personalization. How would you structure your feedback to be both constructive and actionable?

2. Scenario: You’re implementing a new peer review process for your team. Some team members are resistant, expressing concerns about criticism and judgment. How would you address these concerns and establish psychological safety?

3. Scenario: You receive feedback that your conversations tend to be too formal and lack warmth. You disagree with this assessment. How would you respond to this feedback in a constructive manner?

4. Scenario: Your team’s peer reviews have identified a common pattern of missed opportunities to personalize interactions. How would you facilitate a collaborative improvement process to address this pattern?

Peer Review Strengths and Challenges

Personal Strengths:

Identify 3-5 specific strengths you bring to peer review processes:

Personal Challenges:

Identify 3-5 specific challenges you face in peer review processes:

Structured Review Methodology Reflection

Framework Development:

Reflect on your approach to developing review frameworks:

1. What key elements do you prioritize when creating a review framework?

2. How do you balance thoroughness with usability in your review approach?

3. What metrics or indicators do you find most valuable when evaluating conversation quality?

Review Process:

Reflect on your personal review process:

1. How do you prepare for conducting a peer review?

2. What strategies do you use to maintain objectivity during reviews?

3. How do you ensure your reviews focus on behaviors rather than personality?

Feedback Principles Reflection

Feedback Delivery:

Reflect on your feedback delivery approach:

1. How do you structure feedback to maximize receptivity?

2. What techniques do you use to maintain psychological safety when delivering challenging feedback?

3. How do you ensure your feedback is specific and actionable?

Feedback Reception:

Reflect on your approach to receiving feedback:

1. What is your typical emotional response to receiving constructive criticism?

2. What strategies do you use to process feedback non-defensively?

3. How do you distinguish between feedback to implement and feedback to consider but potentially set aside?

Collaborative Improvement Reflection

Pattern Recognition:

Reflect on your approach to identifying improvement patterns:

1. How do you identify patterns across multiple peer reviews?

2. What methods do you use to prioritize improvement opportunities?

3. How do you connect individual feedback to team-wide improvement initiatives?

Collaborative Learning:

Reflect on your approach to collaborative learning:

1. How do you facilitate knowledge sharing among peers?

2. What techniques do you use to transform individual insights into team learning?

3. How do you ensure collaborative improvement initiatives lead to sustained behavior change?

Implementation Planning

7-Day Implementation Plan:

Develop a 7-day plan to implement one specific peer review technique:

Day	Action	Resources Needed	Success Indicators
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

30-Day Development Goal:

Identify one peer review capability you want to develop over the next 30 days:

Capability to develop:

Current state:

Desired state:

Development approach:

Success metrics:

Resources needed:

Commitment Statement

Based on this self-evaluation, I commit to the following approach to peer review processes:

My peer review philosophy:

My priorities for giving and receiving feedback:

My approach to facilitating collaborative improvement:

My commitment to continuous development in this area:

---

Self-Evaluation Completion

After completing this self-evaluation, discuss your results with a trainer to identify specific development opportunities and resources. Then proceed to the [[Training Site/content/Chatting Team/[Day 7] - Quality Assurance/[2] - Questions/Enhanced Day 7 Assessment - Section 3.md|Enhanced Day 7 Assessment - Section 3]].